fix: (some) bad grammar
All checks were successful
Release CI action / build-and-push-container (push) Successful in 2m48s
All checks were successful
Release CI action / build-and-push-container (push) Successful in 2m48s
Also add anotehr disclaimer. This was not very well written.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a6c1089e8
commit
c25a925a5e
@ -9,17 +9,17 @@ categories = ['opinion']
|
|||||||
## Disclaimer
|
## Disclaimer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This was written as a student project as part of our ethics course, where we had to write an opinion piece on anything
|
This was written as a student project as part of our ethics course, where we had to write an opinion piece on anything
|
||||||
we wanted in the field of computer science. Note that this was before *LLM*'s was a thing.
|
we wanted in the field of computer science. Note that this was before *LLM*'s was a thing. I also apologize if the
|
||||||
|
wording is off - this was written in an afternoon as a rush-job. I still think it's an interesting read though.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Computation in Nature
|
# Computation in Nature
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> "If you ever think your code is bad, just remember that CPUs are just rocks that we tricked into thinking"
|
> "If you ever think your code is bad, just remember that CPUs are just rocks that we tricked into thinking"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Does the nature compute, or the computation is something that only the humans are
|
**Does nature compute, or is computation something that only humans are doing? If so, what is it about?**
|
||||||
doing? If so, what is it about?**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To answer this question, we would need to define what the terms used in it even means. If you look up the definition
|
To answer this question, we would need to define what the terms used in it even means. If you look up the definition
|
||||||
of the word ’compute’ on Merriam Websters dictionary, you will find that it primarily means _"to determine
|
of the word ’compute’ on Merriam Websters dictionary, you find that it primarily means _"to determine
|
||||||
especially by mathematical means"_. This definition mentions a usage of mathematics, which suggests a close bond
|
especially by mathematical means"_. This definition mentions a usage of mathematics, which suggests a close bond
|
||||||
between these concepts. What would it mean to determine something? I would argue that it means to make a decision
|
between these concepts. What would it mean to determine something? I would argue that it means to make a decision
|
||||||
based on either prior experience, data or calculations. This implies that computation have a focus on deciding
|
based on either prior experience, data or calculations. This implies that computation have a focus on deciding
|
||||||
@ -33,20 +33,20 @@ mentions that flower petals rarely exceeds a quantity of five. We even see the f
|
|||||||
seeds](http://popmath.org.uk/rpamaths/rpampages/sunflower.html).
|
seeds](http://popmath.org.uk/rpamaths/rpampages/sunflower.html).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
An example of computation in nature is actually very easy to find. Take a rabbit, or any other smaller prey. A rabbit
|
An example of computation in nature is actually very easy to find. Take a rabbit, or any other smaller prey. A rabbit
|
||||||
is constantly observing and reacting to the sorrounding environment, otherwise it will get eaten by predators or fall
|
is constantly observing and reacting to the sorrounding environment, otherwise it gets eaten by predators or fall
|
||||||
into a lake and drown or any other scenario involving death. You could argue that the rabbit is constantly asking
|
into a lake and drown or any other scenario involving death. You could argue that the rabbit is constantly asking
|
||||||
questions about what to: _"Should I run away?"_, _"Should I keep eating?"_, _"Should I be eating this?"_ etc. The
|
questions about what to: _"Should I run away?"_, _"Should I keep eating?"_, _"Should I be eating this?"_ etc. The
|
||||||
rabbit may not be consciously aware of these queries, but nevertheless, it is answering to them through actions.
|
rabbit may not be consciously aware of these queries, but nevertheless, it is answering to them through actions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In Empiricism, the concept of a mind being a blank slate (in this case we are talking about a human mind, not
|
In Empiricism, the concept of a mind being a blank slate (in this case we are talking about a human mind, not
|
||||||
a rabbit’s) and experiences gets remembered is very much applicable here. This trait means that a human mind
|
a rabbit’s), which remembers experiences throughout it's life is very much applicable here. This trait means that a
|
||||||
has a memory, i.e. It can remember old conclusions and recall them when desired. We can actually prove that this
|
human mind has a memory, i.e. It can remember old conclusions and recall them when desired. We can actually prove that
|
||||||
trait is not exclusive to humans, since we can observe other mammals (and even fish and reptiles) demonstrating
|
this trait is not exclusive to humans, since we can observe other mammals (and even fish and reptiles) demonstrating
|
||||||
the usage of memory. A prime example is the elephant.
|
the usage of memory. A prime example is the elephant, but pretty much any animal applies here.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In Rationalism, we see a similar pattern of using the method of deduction to find conclusions and deduct new
|
In Rationalism, we see a similar pattern that mimics memory - using the method of deduction to find conclusions and
|
||||||
conclusions (memory). However, if you were to believe the Rationalists, getting the data needed for computation
|
deduct new conclusions. However, if you were to believe the Rationalists, getting the data needed for computation
|
||||||
in nature, may be a tricky task. We previously had an assumption, that we could trust our senses and that other
|
in nature, may be a tricky task. We previously had an assumption that we could trust our senses and that other
|
||||||
creatures also had senses. In Rationalism the only thing we can trust is the fact that we are doubting. Since we
|
creatures also had senses. In Rationalism the only thing we can trust is the fact that we are doubting. Since we
|
||||||
can’t say anything about if the rabbit is doubting everything. This is where the rabbit example breaks down a
|
can’t say anything about if the rabbit is doubting everything. This is where the rabbit example breaks down a
|
||||||
little, but we are not completely stuck here. Humans are mammals and mammals are a type of animal. Animals are
|
little, but we are not completely stuck here. Humans are mammals and mammals are a type of animal. Animals are
|
||||||
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ to because of the time era he was in and that AI as a field was not as big (if a
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Turing finishes the article with the notion that there is still a lot of work to be done in the field of AI and it
|
Turing finishes the article with the notion that there is still a lot of work to be done in the field of AI and it
|
||||||
is a fun contrast to see what arguments and thoughts a mind like his had back in the fifties, compared to modern
|
is a fun contrast to see what arguments and thoughts a mind like his had back in the fifties, compared to modern
|
||||||
AI can offer. Will humans ever be able to create a truly conscious artificial mind? And will we ever be able to
|
AI can offer. Will humans ever be able to create a truly conscious artificial mind? And will we ever be able to
|
||||||
test it properly?
|
test it properly?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you believe the Mathematical Realists, mathematics is a thing that exists independently of humans, and can be
|
If you believe the Mathematical Realists, mathematics is a thing that exists independently of humans, and can be
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user